Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Alexandre Vasconcellos ( avasconcellos@dse.ufpb.br ) Academic editor: Gabriel L. F. Mejdalani
© 2018 Aila Soares Ferreira, Isabel Medeiros dos Santos Rocha, Bruno Cavalcante Bellini, Alexandre Vasconcellos.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ferreira AS, Rocha IMS, Bellini BC, Vasconcellos A (2018) Effects of habitat heterogeneity on epiedaphic Collembola (Arthropoda: Hexapoda) in a semiarid ecosystem in Northeast Brazil. Zoologia 35: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e13653
|
The spatial distribution of abiotic resources and environmental conditions can vary at small scales within terrestrial ecosystems, influencing the composition of soil fauna. Epiedaphic springtails (Collembola) of a semiarid Caatinga ecosystem were studied to determine if factors related to vegetation structure, such as species richness, aerial biomass, litterfall, and soil characteristics (pH, granulometry and soil organic matter), influence species richness and abundance of this group. A total of 5,513 individuals were collected of 15 species distributed in 13 genera and 9 families. The most abundant species were Temeritas sp., with 2,086 (38% of the total abundance) individuals, and Neotropiella meridionalis (Arlé, 1939), with 1,911 (35% of the total abundance) individuals. None of the variables in the regression model were significantly related to Collembola species richness, but abundance was significantly related to plant species richness, aerial biomass and soil pH. Thus, even at a small spatial scale, habitat heterogeneity influences the epiedaphic Collembola in the Caatinga ecosystem, especially their abundance.
Caatinga, diversity, soil dynamics, soil mesofauna, Neotropical Region.
Habitat spatial heterogeneity plays a key role in species diversity, allowing populations to persist through the exploitation of a variety of resources and refuges (
In terrestrial ecosystems, studies on grasshoppers (
Collembola assemblages appear to be positively influenced by heterogeneity, habitat size, and resource availability (
Caatinga is a seasonally dry tropical forest that covers approximately 970,000 km2 of a semiarid region almost entirely restricted to the Northeast Region of Brazil (
Currently, Caatinga is one of the South American phytogeographic domains most affected by anthropogenic disturbance, including desertification (
Springtails were collected in Caatinga from Cauaçu Farm (05°32’15”S, 35°49’11”W), located at municipality of João Câmara, state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. The study area covers 700 ha of a continuum of habitats composed of secondary forests with distinct disturbance histories and distinct levels of vegetation recovery, and has a strong decidual character, losing practically all leaves during the dry season. The climate of the region is semiarid with an average annual rainfall of 648.6 mm and a short rainy season from March to June. The average annual temperature is 24.7 °C with a minimum temperature of 21 °C and a maximum of 32 °C.
A grid of 2000 × 500 m that has been undisturbed for more than 50 years was delimited and, within this area, 30 plots (20 ×20 m) were randomly selected for sampling springtails and quantifying habitat variables. Two samplings were performed, one during the rainy season (July 2011) and another during the dry period (November 2011), using five pitfall traps in each plot, disposed in a cross-shaped design and distant 1m from each other. Traps were 20 cm high and 10 cm in diameter and each one contained 300 ml of 70% ethanol; they were left exposed for 48 hours in each plot.
All sampled specimens were counted under a stereomicroscope and posteriorly mounted on glass slides in Hoyer’s medium, following the methodology described by
Species richness, density, and aerial biomass of the vegetation were obtained through a phytosociological study using the plots method (
Litterfall was collected each month from November 2010 to October 2011 in a 1m × 1m collector net composed of a galvanized steel frame suspending a nylon mesh (1.0 mm) approximately 20 cm above the ground at the center of each plot. The nylon mesh enabled the falling litter to be collected without accumulating water (and thus avoided decomposition during the rainy season) (
To evaluate which of the studied habitat parameters best explain the species richness and abundance of epiedaphic Collembola in Caatinga, a multiple linear regression was performed between the assemblage and habitat parameters (plant species richness, plant density (ind./100 m²), aerial biomass of the vegetation (kg) and litterfall, as well as the pH, organic matter (g.dm-3) and sand (g.kg-1)). Regression analyzes were also performed for the most abundant species. The parameters included in this model vary spatially and can create habitat heterogeneity on a local scale (
A total of 5,513 springtails were collected, distributed in 15 species, 13 genera and 9 families (Table
Epiedaphic Collembola taxa recorded from João Câmara, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, in July 2011 (rainy period) and November 2011 (dry period) and their respective abundances.
| Taxa | Abundance |
|---|---|
| Poduromorpha | |
| Brachystomellidae | |
| Brachystomella aff. agrosa | 596 |
| Neanuridae | |
| Neotropiella meridionalis (Arlé, 1939) | 1,911 |
| Entomobryomorpha | |
| Entomobryidae | |
| Lepidocyrtus sp. | 61 |
| Rhynchocyrtus cf. klausi | 3 |
| Seira sp. 1 | 90 |
| Seira sp. 2 | 336 |
| Seira sp. 3 | 10 |
| Isotomidae | |
| Desoria trispinata (Mac Gillivray, 1896) | 20 |
| Hemisotoma thermophila (Axelson, 1900) | 1 |
| Paronellidae | |
| Trogolaphysa sp. | 6 |
| Symphypleona | |
| Bourletiellidae | |
| Stenognathriopes sp. | 22 |
| Dicyrtomidae | |
| Calvatomina sp. | 210 |
| Sminthuridae | |
| Temeritas sp. | 2,086 |
| Sminthurididae | |
| Sminthurides sp. | 11 |
| Sphaeridia sp. | 150 |
| Total abundance | 5,513 |
| Total richness | 15 |
Species richness and abundance were not correlated (r = 0.42) and, therefore, both were separately treated as dependent variables in the models. A correlogram between the environmental variables also showed a weak relation between them (r < 0.5); therefore, both were inserted in the regression model. The environmental variables included in the model did not significantly explain the epiedaphic Collembola species richness (R2 = 29%, R2adj = 1.7%, P-value > 0.5), but the regression model explained approximately 59% (R2 = 59%, R2adj = 43%, P-value < 0.01) of the variation in epiedaphic Collembola abundance (Table
Based on the regressions among environmental variables and abundance of each species, only two of the sampled habitat variables significantly affected the number of individuals: Seira sp. 2 (R² = 0.47, R²adj = 0.17, P-value < 0.05) was positively correlated with litter production and Sphaeridia sp. (R2 = 0.48, R²adj = 0.27, P-value < 0.05) was positively correlated with both plant density (P-value < 0.01) and litter production (P-value < 0.05).
Results of multiple regressions between epiedaphic Collembola abundance (R2: 59%, R2adj: 43%, P-value: 0.011) and richness (R2: 29%, R2adj: 1.7%, P-value: 0.424) and environmental variables recorded in João Câmara, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, in 2011. SOM: soil organic matter.
| Abundance | Richness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental factors | T-value | P-value | T-value | P-value |
| Plant richness | 3.549 | 0.002* | 1.961 | 0.065 |
| Plant density | -2.056 | 0.054 | 0.779 | 0.446 |
| Aerial biomass | -3.237 | 0.004* | -1.260 | 0.223 |
| Sand | -1.755 | 0.096 | -0.653 | 0.521 |
| SOM | -0.422 | 0.678 | 0.119 | 0.906 |
| pH | 3.094 | 0.006* | 2.059 | 0.054 |
| Litterfall | 1.352 | 0.193 | 0.192 | 0.850 |
Collembola species richness recorded in this study is in accordance with other studies performed in Caatinga, which range from 2 to 15 species (
Epiedaphic Collembola abundance was explained by plant richness and aerial biomass, indicating that Caatinga plant assemblage influences habitat structure and, possibly, the availability of direct and indirect food resources for these hexapods. Although springtails are considered generalist consumers, intestinal content analysis has shown considerable amounts of plant organic matter in the digestive tracts of several Neotropical species (
Epiedaphic Collembola assemblage only responded positively to spatial heterogeneity of the environment via plant richness, which potentially contributes to production of a more biochemically diverse litterfall that serves as a direct and/or indirect resource for different populations. A relationship between the composition of Collembola assemblages and vegetation structure and habitat quality has been previously suggested (
Variation in Collembola abundance was also explained by variation in soil pH, reflecting the expected adaptation of some species to subneutral soil pH as previously presented in the literature (
The small-scale spatial variations affected the epiedaphic Collembola fauna in the studied semiarid ecosystem, especially the abundance of individuals, which was influenced by changes in some vegetation parameters such as plant species richness, aerial biomass, and soil pH. In contrast, the measured variables did not explain the variation in species richness, suggesting that other unmeasured variables, such as soil moisture and temperature, plant litter height, and predation pressure may be more closely related to variation in Collembola species richness. It is possible that temperature and humidity, isolated or in synergism, represent important environmental factors that affect Collembola activity in semiarid ecosystems. This fauna can be active only during periods of lower temperature and higher humidity, such as night, early morning, and sunset. In this way, active methods (soil core samples or entomological aspiration) or passive (pitfall traps) can reveal different species richness and abundance, biasing the results.
We thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Universal/CNPq, processes 441451/2014-4, PQ2015, 301498/2015-6) for funding this study and Uirandé Oliveira, Pedro Capistrano, Daniel Oliveira, Nicolas de Araújo, Heitor Bruno, and Thiago Felipe for their assistance in collecting the samples.