Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Daiane Ouvernay ( ouvernay@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Luis Fabio Silveira
© 2018 Daiane Ouvernay, Ildemar Ferreira, Juan J. Morrone.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ouvernay D, Ferreira I, Morrone JJ (2018) Areas of endemism of hummingbirds (Aves: Apodiformes: Trochilidae) in the Andean and Neotropical regions. Zoologia 35: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e13673
|
Using track analysis and cladistic biogeography, we identified areas of endemism of hummingbirds in the Andean and Neotropical regions. Our results point out that the current areas of endemism of hummingbirds occur in the Andes, Guiana Shield, the Lesser Antilles, western Central and North America and the Chiapas Highlands. The cladistic biogeographic analysis suggests a hummingbird distribution shaped mainly by dispersal events.
Historical biogeography, cladistic biogeography, dispersal events, PAE
Biogeography is the science that aims at explaining the distribution of life on Earth and investigating the processes behind it. It also determines the historical relationship between the occurrence areas of a given taxon based on their distribution and phylogenetic analysis (
On the other hand, an area of endemism is a geographic region that has several taxa with their distribution restricted to it (
Based on the presence of endemic taxa,
Transition zones are also important elements, because they show a mixture of biotic elements of two regions (
Both in the Neotropical and Andean regions, as well as in the transition zones, several areas of endemism have been identified for different taxa (
With the objective of contributing to the knowledge of the biogeography of these regions, we undertook a track analysis and a cladistic biogeographic analysis, aimed at identifying areas of endemism of hummingbirds (Trochilidae) in the Andean and Neotropical regions. We also describe the distribution of hummingbirds in under the light of a current molecular phylogenetic hypothesis proposed for the taxon (
The Andean and Neotropical regions are natural biogeographic units delimited by the presence of endemic taxa (
We used as models 265 Trochilidae species (approximately 78% of hummingbirds’ richness), which comprised the following clades proposed by
Track analysis is based on three basic concepts: individual tracks, generalized tracks, and nodes (
We connected each locality to the nearest one, forming individual tracks. Superimposed individual tracks formed generalized tracks, which are areas where a former ancestral biota have fragmented due to vicariance events (
For this analysis, we used a parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE) that classifies areas according to the species they share, which allows the identification of biotic relationships (
With this analysis, we sought to identify areas where ancestral populations of hummingbirds were fragmented by vicariance events. This analysis is possible through the generalized tracks (
This analysis consists in replacing the name of the species with the area where it is distributed in the terminal branches of the taxon cladogram. The congruence between different area cladograms will allow obtaining a general area cladogram, whose sequence indicates its historical separation (
For each species of the cladogram we analyzed its individual track. This way, we obtained the provinces where each species was recorded. Based on this analysis, we built a presence/absence matrix (1/0), in which the rows were biogeographic provinces and the columns, species. Based on this matrix, we obtained the general cladograms of the areas using the software WinClada. Data from this study, the species used and the location of biogeographic provinces are presented in the supplementary material (Fig. S1 and Table S1).
Based on the superimposition of the individual tracks, we found 17 generalized tracks (Fig.
Support of the generalized track of Trochilidae and superimposition of other tracks.
| Track | Species | Provinces ( |
Overlapping tracks |
| A | Eulampis holosericeus and Oreotrochilus estella | Lesser Antilles |
|
| B | Leucippus baeri and Myrmia micrura | Ecuadorian + Cauca |
|
| D | Atthis ellioti; Campylopterus rufus and Doricha enicura | Chiapas Higlands + Veracruzan |
|
| E | Chalcostigma ruficeps, Heliodoxa aurescens, H. branickii and Eriocnemis sapphiropygia | Puna + Rondônia + Ucayali |
|
| F | Adelomyia melanogenys, Amazilia viridicauda, Chalcostigma stanleyi and Metallura eupogon | Puna + Rondônia + Ucayali |
|
| G | Aglaeactis aliciae and Metallura phoebe | Puna | del Río et al. ( |
| L | Amazilia decora, Chlorostibon assimilis, Elvira chionura, Eupherusa nigriventris, Lampornis calolaemus, L. hemileucus, Lophornis adorabilis, Selasphorus flammula and S. scintilla | Guatuso-Talamanca + Puntarenas-Chiriquí |
|
| M | Chaetocercus heliodor and Heliangelus mavors | Guajira |
|
| N | Amazilia castaneiventris, A. saucerottei, Anthocephala floriceps, Boissonneaua flavescens and Coeligena bonapartei | Magdalena + Cauca |
|
| O | Heliangelus exortis, Heliodoxa imperatrix and Metallura williami | Cauca |
|
| P | Eriocnemis nigrivestris, Haplophaedia lugens, Heliangelus strophianus and Urochroa bougueri | Cauca | del Río et al. ( |
| R | Archilochus colubri and Hylocharis eliciae | Guatuso-Talamanca + Pacific Lowlands + Chiapas Highlands |
|
The general area cladogram (Fig.
Considering the area cladograms for each clade, the cladogram obtained in the biogeographic analysis for Topazes supports Araucaria Forest as the sister group of ((Atlantic, Parana Forest) Cerrado (Caatinga (Xingú-Tapajós (Pará (Roraima (Guiana Lowlands (Pantepui (Imeri, Madeira)))))))). The synapomorphic species of this clade, Florisuga fusca, was probably extinct in (Xingú-Tapajós (Pará (Roraima (Guiana Lowlands (Pantepui (Imeri, Madeira)))))) (see Fig.
The Hermits clade shows a broad distribution, from the Mexican transition zone to the provinces of the Southern Brazil dominion, the South American transition zone and the Chacoan sub-region. The area cladogram implies several dispersal events and two synapomorphies, all in South America (Table
The Mountain Gems clade shows a more restricted distribution than the previous clades. It occurs from the Mexican transition zone to the provinces in northern South America, in the Pacific dominion. The area cladogram supports with four synapomorphies the monophyly of the provinces Guatuso-Talamanca and Puntarenas-Chiquiri.
The distribution of the Bees clade is associated with the provinces close to the Pacific coast, in the western part of the American continent, from the Mexican transition zone to the South American transition zone. The area cladogram shows only one synapomorphy, which places the Transmexican Volcanic Belt as the sister group of (Sierra Madre del Sur, Balsas Basin). The other clade places the Desert province as the sister group of (Puna (Yungas (Rondônia (Ucayali (Napo (Paramo (Magdalena, Cauca))))))) and Rondônia as the sister group of (Ucayali (Napo (Paramo (Magdalena, Cauca)))).
The distribution of the Mangoes clade comprises the Mexican transition zone, the Antilles, all the Brazilian sub-region, part of the South American transition zone, and the Xingú-Tapajós province, in the South-eastern Amazonian dominion. The area cladogram shows groups supported by a single synapomorphy, in which the sister group of (Pará (Roraima (Guianan Lowlands (Pantepui (Imerí, Madeira))))) is followed by Pantepui of (Imerí, Madeira). In the Antilles sub-region, there is the clade Hispaniola and Puerto Rico, and in the Brazilian sub-region, the clade Guatuso-Talamanca and Puntarenas-Chiquiri.
The clade Brilliants is distributed from the Mesoamerican dominion to the South American transition zone, and some provinces of the Pacific, Boreal Brazilian and Chacoan dominions. The area cladogram shows nine synapomorphies; the best was supported by Yungas as the sister group of (Rondônia (Ucayali (Napo (Páramo (Magdalena, Cauca)))))), Ucayali as the sister group of (Napo (Páramo (Magdalena, Cauca))))), and Páramo as the sister group of (Magdalena, Cauca).
The clade Coquettes is distributed in western Neotropical provinces and some provinces of the Andes and South American transition zone. The area cladogram shows the extinction of the entire clade in the provinces Chocó-Darién, Guatuso-Talamanca, and Puntarenas-Chiquirí and strongly supports three groups. The first places Desert as the sister group of (Puna (Yungas (Rondônia (Ucayali (Napo (Páramo (Magdalena, Cauca))))))), the second places Puna as the sister group of (Yungas (Rondônia (Ucayali (Napo (Páramo (Magdalena, Cauca)))))), and the third supports the clade Magdalena + Cauca.
The clade Emeralds showed the largest number of records and also the largest distribution, which comprises the Mexican transition zone, the Antilles, and almost all the Neotropical provinces of South America, as well as part of the South American transition zone. The area cladogram showed 11 synapomorphies. The first places the Ecuadorian province as the sister group of the provinces in the Neotropical region and rhe Mexican transition zone except (Atacaman, Prepuna) and Galapagos Islands and Pampean as the sister group of (Araucaria forest (Atlantic, Parana forest) (Cerrado (Caatinga (Xingu-Tapajós (Pará (Roraima (Guianan Lowlands (Pantepui (Imeri, Madeira))))))))), also in the same clade between Atlantic and Parana forest, Pantepui and (Imeri, Madeira). In addition, Mosquito is the sister group of (Veracruzan (Chiapas Highlands, Pacific Lowlands)), Guajira and Venezuelan, Choco-Darién is the sister area of (Guatuso-Talamanca, Puntarenas-Chiquiri), Yungas is the sister group of (Rondônia (Ucayali (Napo (Paramo (Magdalena, Cauca))))), Ucayali is the sister group of (Napo (Paramo (Magdalena, Cauca))). The clade Magdalena + Cauca is supported, though weakly.
Events of dispersal, extinction and synapomorphies represented in the cladogram (Fig.
| Number in the cladogram | Synapomorphy | Dispersal | Extinction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Ancestor of Brilliants, Coquettes, Montain Gems, Patagona gigas, Bees and Emeralds | Ancestor of Topazes and Hermits | – |
| 3 | Bees and Patagona gigas | – | – |
| 4 | Ancestor of Patagona gigas, Montain Gems, Bees and Emeralds | Ancestor of Brilliants, Coquettes, Montain Gems, Patagona gigas, Bees and Emeralds | – |
| 5 | – | Mangoes and ancestor of Topazes and Hermits | – |
| 6 | – | Emeralds and Mangoes | – |
| 7 | – | Coquettes, Emeralds, Hermits and ancestor of Hermits | – |
| 8 | – | Brilliants, Emeralds and Hermits | – |
| 9 | – | Brilliants, Mangoes and ancestor of Brilliants, Coquettes, Montain Gems, Patagona gigas, Bees and Emeralds | Mangoes |
| 10 | – | Brilliants, Coquettes, Mangoes, Hermits and ancestor of Coquettes | – |
| 11 | Brilliants and Coquettes | Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Montain Gems, Topazes, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Topazes and Bees | – |
| 12 | Coquettes | Brilliants and Emeralds | – |
| 13 | Brilliants, Coquettes and Emeralds | Brilliants, Coquettes, Hermits and Mangoes | – |
| 14 | Brilliants and Hermits | Bees, Brilliants, Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | – |
| 15 | Brilliants, Emeralds and Hermits | Emeralds and Hermits | Coquettes and Emeralds |
| 16 | Brilliants and Coquettes | Brilliants, Hermits, Mangoes and ancestor of Mangoes | Brilliants and Emeralds |
| 17 | Brilliants | Brilliants, Emeralds, Mangoes, Montain Gems and ancestor of Montain Gems and Bees | – |
| 18 | Brilliants, Coquettes and Emeralds | Coquettes, Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | Hermits |
| 19 | – | Ancestor of Montain Gems, Bees, Emeralds and Patagona gigas | – |
| 20 | – | Ancestor of Brilliants, Coquettes, Montain Gems, Bees, Emeralds and Patagona gigas | – |
| 21 | – | Brilliants and Mangoes | – |
| 22 | Coquettes | Brilliants | – |
| 23 | – | Ancestor of Montain Gems, Bees, Emeralds and Patagona gigas | – |
| 24 | – | Brilliants, Emeralds and Mangoes | – |
| 25 | – | – | Ancestor of Mangoes, Brilliants, Coquettes, Montain Gems, Emeralds and Patagona gigas |
| 26 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 27 | – | Emeralds | Emeralds |
| 28 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 29 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 30 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 31 | – | Coquettes, Montain Gems and ancestor of Montain Gems and Bees | Emeralds |
| 32 | – | Emeralds, Mangoes, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Bees, Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Hermits, Mangoes, Montain Gems and Topazes | – |
| 33 | – | Emeralds and Hermits | – |
| 34 | – | Bees, Coquettes, Emeralds, Mangoes, Montain Gems, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Topazes, Hermits, Coquettes, Brilliants, Mantoes, Montain Gems, Bees and Emeralds | – |
| 35 | – | Bees | – |
| 36 | – | Hermits and Montain Gems | – |
| 37 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 38 | Emeralds | Emeralds and Hermits | – |
| 39 | Ancestor of Topazes | Hermits, Topazes and ancestor of Hermits and Topazes | – |
| 40 | - | Hermits and Mangoes | – |
| 41 | Emeralds | Hermits and Emeralds | – |
| 42 | Brilliants, Emeralds and Hermits | Brilliants, Mangoes, Patagona gigas, and ancestor of Bees, Briliiants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Mangoes and Montain Gems | – |
| 43 | – | Hermits and Montain Gems | – |
| 44 | Hermits | – | – |
| 45 | – | Emeralds and Hermits | Emeralds |
| 46 | – | Hermits | – |
| 47 | – | Hermits | Emeralds and Hermits |
| 48 | – | Emeralds | Hermits |
| 49 | Mangoes | Mangoes, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Bees, Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Mangoes and Montain Gems | Topazes |
| 50 | – | Emeralds and Hermits | Emeralds and Hermits |
| 51 | – | Mangoes | Ancestor of Hermits and Topazes |
| 52 | – | Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | – |
| 53 | Coquettes | Brilliants, Emeralds, Mangoes, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Bees, Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds and Montain Gems | – |
| 54 | – | – | Hermits and Mangoes |
| 55 | Mangoes | Mangoes | Emeralds |
| 56 | Emeralds | Emeralds | Hermits |
| 57 | Hermits | Brilliants, Emeralds, Hermits, Topazes and ancestor of Brilliants | Emeralds |
| 58 | – | Brilliants, Coquettes and Hermits | Mangoes and Topazes |
| 59 | – | Emeralds and Mangoes | Brilliants, Coquettes, Hermits, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Bees, Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Montain Gems |
| 60 | Emeralds and Mangoes | Emeralds | – |
| 61 | Mangoes | Emeralds | – |
| 62 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 63 | Emeralds and Mangoes | Mangoes | – |
| 64 | Emeralds and Mangoes | Bees, Emeralds, Mangoes and Montain Gems | – |
| 65 | – | Emeralds, Mangoes | – |
| 66 | – | Emeralds, Hermits and Montain Gems | Mangoes |
| 67 | Emeralds | Emeralds and Mangoes | – |
| 68 | – | Emeralds and Hermits | Coquettes and Hermits |
| 69 | – | Bees, Emeralds, Hermits, Mangoes and Montain Gems | – |
| 70 | – | – | Hermits |
| 71 | – | Bees, Emeralds and Mangoes | – |
| 72 | – | Emeralds | – |
| 73 | – | Emeralds, Hermits and Montain Gems | Emeralds |
| 74 | – | Brilliants, Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | Emeralds, Patagona gigas and ancestor of Bees, Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Hermits, Mangoes, Montain Gems and Topazes |
| 75 | – | Coquettes, Emeralds, Mangoes, Montain Gems and ancestor of Bees and Montain Gems | – |
| 76 | – | Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds and Hermits | Brilliants |
| 77 | – | Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | – |
| 78 | Emeralds | Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | – |
| 79 | Emeralds | Emeralds, Hermits and Mangoes | Brilliants and Coquettes |
| 80 | Brilliants | Brilliants, Coquettes, Emeralds and Montain Gems | Brilliants, Coquettes and Emeralds |
| 81 | – | Brilliants, Coquettes and Emeralds | Mangoes |
| 82 | Emeralds | Brilliants and Emeralds | Emeralds and Mangoes |
| 83 | Emeralds, Mangoes and Montain Gems | Bees, Emeralds, Mangoes and Montain Gems | Brilliants |
| 84 | Emeralds | Bees and Hermits | Montain Gems |
| 85 | Montain Gems | Emeralds and Montain Gems | Emeralds |
| 86 | Bees | Bees and Hermits | Emeralds |
| 87 | – | – | Patagona gigas, Emeralds and Montain Gems |
| 88 | Brilliants | Emeralds and Hermits | Brilliants and Coquettes |
| 89 | – | – | Brilliants and Patagona gigas |
| 90 | – | – | Coquettes and Brilliants |
| 91 | – | Bees | Emeralds and Hermits |
The track analysis suggests that current areas of endemism of hummingbirds occur in the Andes, Guiana Shield, Lesser Antilles, western Central and North America. In southern Mexico, more precisely in the Chiapas Highlands province, there is a biogeographic node: a zone of complex diversity for the family (Fig.
Track “A” comprises the entire province of Lesser Antilles and part of Hispaniola, and is supported by Mangoes (Eulampis holosericeus (Linnaeus, 1758)) and Coquettes (Oreotrochilus estella (d’Orbigny & Lafresnaye, 1838)). This track suggests the fragmentation of the hummingbird population as had already occurred for other taxa (
Tracks “B”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “M”, “N”, “O”, and “P” are related to the uplift of the northern, southern, and central parts of the Andes and are supported by Bees (Chaetocercus heliodor (Bourcier, 1840) and Myrmia micrura (Gould, 1854)), Emeralds (Amazilia castaneiventris (Gould, 1856)), A. saucerottei (Delattre & Bourcier, 1846), A. viridicauda (von Berlepsch, 1883), Anthocephala floriceps (Gould, 1853) and Leucippus baeri Simon, 1901), Coquettes (Adelomyia melanogenys (Fraser, 1840), Chalcostigma ruficeps (Gould, 1846), C. stanleyi (Bourcier, 1851), Heliangelus exortis (Fraser, 1840), H. mavors Gould, 1848, H. strophianus (Gould, 1846), Metallura eupogon (Cabanis, 1874), M. phoebe (Lesson & Delattre, 1839) and M. williami (Delattre & Bourcier, 1846)) and Brilliants (Aglaeactis aliciae Salvin, 1896, Boissonneaua flavescens (Loddiges, 1832), Coeligena bonapartei (Boissonneau, 1840), Eriocnemis mirabilis Meyer de Schauensee, 1967, E. nigrivestris (Bourcier & Mulsant, 1852), E. sapphiropygia Taczanowski, 1874, Haplophaedia lugens (Gould, 1852), Heliodoxa aurescens (Gould, 1846), H. branickii (Taczanowski, 1874), H. imperatrix (Gould, 1856) and Urochroa bougueri (Bourcier, 1851) and comprise the Ecuadorian, Cauca, Desert, Ucayali, Rondônia, Yungas, Guajira, Magdalena, and Chocó-Darién provinces. The importance of the Andes for hummingbirds has been highlighted in several studies (
Tracks “H” and “J” comprise the Venezuelan and Trinidad provinces, in the Cordillera de La Costa and are supported by Emeralds (Campylopterus ensipennis (Swainson, 1822) and Chalybura buffoni (Lesson, 1832)), Bees (Chaetocercus jourdanii (Bourcier, 1839)) and Hermits (Phaethornis longuemareus (Lesson, 1832)).
Most of track “Q” is located in the Pantepui and part of Imerí, and is supported by Brilliants (Heliodoxa xanthogonys Salvin & Godman, 1882) and Emeralds (Amazilia cupreicauda Salvin & Godman, 1884). The area comprises a mountain complex whose importance and formation will be discussed later.
Track “I” is supported only by Emeralds (Lepidopyga coeruleogularis (Gould, 1851)) and Juliamyia julie (Bourcier, 1843)) and comprises the provinces of Chocó-Dárien and Guatuso-Talamanca. Therefore, we hypothesize that the closing of the Isthmus of Panama, at approximately 3-5 million years ago, affected the distribution of Trochilidae in the area.
Tracks “C”, “D”, “L” and “R” are supported by Mountain Gems (Heliomaster constantii (Delattre, 1843), Lamprolaima rhami (Lesson, 1839), Lampornis calolaemus (Salvin, 1865) and L. hemileucus (Salvin, 1865)), Bees (Archilochus colubris (Linnaeus, 1758), Atthis ellioti Ridgway, 1878, Doricha enicura (Vieillot, 1818), Selasphorus flammula Salvin, 1865, S. scintilla (Gould, 1851), Tilmatura dupontii (Lesson, 1832)), Emeralds (Amazilia decora (Salvin, 1891), Campylopterus rufus Lesson, 1840, Chlorostilbon assimilis Lawrence, 1861, Elvira chionura (Gould, 1851), Eupherusa nigriventris Lawrence, 1868 and Hylocharis eliciae (Bourcier & Mulsant, 1846) and Coquettes (Lophornis adorabilis Salvin, 1870). In the same area, there is also a biogeographic node. It comprises the provinces located in the Mexican transition zone and the Mesoamerican dominion. All tracks are located in provinces of the western coast, close to the Pacific Ocean. The tracks partially superimpose with those obtained by
Some important events that occurred in the Andean and Neotropical region during the Neogene equally influenced different clades of Trochilidae: uplift of the Andes (
Tectonic processes of the Andean orogeny reshaped South America nearly to the current form (
The tectonism involved with the uplift of the central and northern parts of the Andes changed the drainage of large rivers, such as the Amazon, Orinoco, and Magdalena, and established the connection of the Amazon River with the Atlantic Ocean, completing the Amazon-Caribbean connection through the “Amazonian sea or Caribbean sea” (
Still in the context of the Andes, with the uplift of the Cordillera Oriental (East Andes) there was the formation of an arid valley (Magdalena Valley) and change in the drainage of the Magdalena River (
In addition to the Andes, the Pantepuis, located in northern South America also showed a significant relevance for Trochilidae, as a generalized track occurs in the region (Fig.
Generalized tracks indicate ancestral populations that have been fragmented by vicariance events (
The relevance of the Andean orogeny for Trochilidae was pointed out by
Another important event in the Neotropical region was the Last Glacial Maximum, which produced profound changes in the physical geography of Earth (
The closing of the Isthmus of Panama occurred at 3-5 million years ago and brought severe climatic and geological changes (
The origin of the Caribbean area is connected to the breakup of Pangea, when Laurasia began to separate from Gondwana (
The Mexican transition zone and the provinces of the Mesoamerican dominion are equally important for hummingbirds, where, in addition to the generalized tracks that indicate endemism, there is a biogeographic node. Geological events that may have shaped the current Trochilidae distribution are volcanism (
During the Miocene, the rise in sea level and tectonic processes in South America produced a significant marine ingression into the continent (
The first synapomorphy found places the Ecuadorian province as the sister group of nearly all the other Neotropical provinces, except Galapagos Island, Prepuna, Atacaman (in the South America transition zone) and Coquimban, Santiagan, Maule and Valdivian. Prepuna and Atacaman would be more related to the provinces of the Andes than the Neotropical ones, as would be Galápagos (Fig.
Our results corroborate the hypothesis that the more basal group (Topazes clade) of Trochilidae was distributed in the plains of South America, and the dispersal to the Andes and North America were posterior events, before the Neogene phase of uplift of the Cordillera (
The Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) funded the present study through its institutional program for sandwich Ph.D. (proc. BEX 10656/14-6), and the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Table S1.
Figure S1.