Corresponding author: Carla Gheler-Costa ( cgheler@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Luis Fabio Silveira
© 2018 Carla Gheler-Costa, Fabio Henrique Comin, Letícia C. Gilli, Luciano M. Verdade.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gheler-Costa C, Comin H, Gilli LC, Verdade LM (2018) Foraging behavior of Brazilian cormorant, Nannopterum brasilianus (Suliformes: Phalacrocoracidae). Zoologia 35: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e14664
|
Although the concept of optimal foraging has been extensively discussed, foraging efficiency is difficult to assess in vertebrates. In this study, we determined the foraging efficiency of the Brazilian cormorant, Nannopterum brasilianus Gmelin, 1789, by the direct, ad libitum observation of a group of four to thirteen individuals in an artificial pond at the University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, state of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil. Although this study was carried out in a highly anthropic environment, we can still conclude that the Brazilian cormorant is a relatively efficient browser and short-term diver. In anthropic environments, foraging success depends on the amount of time these birds spend diving, and stealing food is less common. Stealing occurs at relatively low rates but tends to be an efficient way to get food.
Food biology, food stealing, foraging success, social behavior, wading birds
Even though most will agree that measuring animal behavior in the context of experimental research helps to decrease the subjectivity of observations (
Although optimal foraging has been extensively discussed (
Cormorants are usually one of the most abundant wading birds in southeastern Brazil, and yet one of the least studied. They usually take two to three years to reach sexual maturity, breed in groups, and present sexual dimorphism (
The study site was a roughly round artificial pond of approximately 0.84 ha (1 m deep) located at the University of São Paulo, Campus “Luiz de Queiroz”, in Piracicaba, central-east region of the state of São Paulo, Brazil (22º43’S, 47º38’W). “Luiz de Queiroz” has 914,5 ha including fragments of native vegetation and agricultural fields, besides laboratories and office buildings.
The artificial pond where this study took place was constructed with cement in the late 1940s. The following species are known from this poind: Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), and Pimelodus sp., all of which have been introduced by humans. The pond has no macrophytes and is surrounded by grass and a few trees. Domestic geese, Anser anser var. domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758); wild ducks, Cairina moschata Linnaeus, 1758); ireres, Dendrocygna viduata (Linnaeus, 1766); great white egrets, Ardea alba Linnaeus, 1758; and the snowy egrets, Egretta thula (Molina, 1782) are also present. People use the area around the pond as a city park.
The cormorant group was observed during a total period of 10h:12 min, early in the morning (7–10 am) and late in the afternoon (4–6 pm), for five days, in November 2000. Group size was determined on every observation period. Foraging behavior was observed with a 10 × 25 binocular by ad libitum sampling, and every occurrence of the behaviors we focused on was recorded (
Diving lasting periods (in seconds) were recorded with a digital chronometer. Fish captured by cormorants could be recorded as the bird emerged to swallow the prey (
We used descriptive statistics on diving period, foraging success and stealing success. In addition, we used one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test the possible relationships between diving lasting period and foraging success, stealing attempts and stealing success.
The average diving period lasted 10.41 ± 4.82 sec (n = 410), ranging from 3.28 to 23.77 sec. The success rate of fishing was 28.05% (n = 115). Diving lasting period significantly differed between successful and unsuccessful dives (F = 17.19, p ≤ 0.001, n = 410) (Fig.
The foraging success of the Brazilian cormorant in the present study can be considered low when compared with the foraging success of the great white egret (
Although the foraging behavior of cormorants generally involves diving, these birds do not seem to be adapted to long periods of submersion (average at the present study = 10.41 ± 4.82 sec). As a matter of fact, shorter dives were significantly more associated with fishing success than longer dives in our data. This pattern suggests that the prey is possibly detected when the cormorant is still swimming, not diving. Dive would be the final attack over an already detected prey. Otherwise, if dives were exploratory, we would expect that longer dives would result in more prey catching success. However, foraging success by waterfowl can be influenced by environmental factors such as water depth, substrate and prey size. As a matter of fact, Brazilian cormorants can dive as deep as 20 m, what would imply on a distinct foraging strategy (
Intraspecific competition for food can result in an increase in the time spent in foraging and greater risks associated with it (
Although foraging success is related to how long the diving lasts, stealing is not. This pattern suggests that stealing is an opportunistic behavior. When individuals forage in groups, cooperatively or not, as soon as a bird gets a prey, another bird may try to steal it. Although the distance among individuals during foraging was not recorded in the present study, stealing attempts mostly involved individuals in closer proximity.
In similar conditions to the present study (i.e., anthropic shallow water bodies with relatively small group sizes), the following inferences about the Brazilian cormorant’s foraging behavior are made: 1) Brazilian cormorants are relatively efficient browsers and short-term divers; 2) Foraging success is related to dive lasting period, but stealing is not; 3) Stealing occurs at relatively low rates but tends to be an efficient way to get food.
Edson Davanzo and José E. Cyrino identified the fish. Gustavo S. Betini helped with field work. LMV holds a Productivity Scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 312049/2015-3).