Research Article |
Corresponding author: Nastaran Heidari ( nastaran4652@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Sionei Ricardo Bonatto
© 2019 Nastaran Heidari.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Heidari N (2019) Ecological niche differentiation between Acanthodactylus micropholis and A. khamirensis (Sauria: Lacertidae) in southern Iran. Zoologia 36: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.36.e27357
|
Acanthodactylus micropholis Heidari, Rastegar-Pouyani, Rastegar-Pouyani & Rajabizadeh, 2013 and A. khamirensis Blanford, 1874 are genetically and morphologically distinct, but their ecological differentiation has not previously been evaluated. The ecological niche models of these two sister species Acanthodactylus were reconstructed using climate and geographical data. Species distribution modeling for A. micropholis and A. khamirensis was used to make predictions and showed that most parts of southern and southeastern Iran are suitable for the distribution of both species. Habitat suitability was mostly dependent upon minimum temperature of the coldest month and seasonal precipitation for A. micropholis and A. khamirensis, respectively. Niche similarity tests (niche overlap and identity tests) were performed to evaluate species differentiation based on the ecological species criterion. Our results indicate that both species have different ecological niches and are significantly separated from each other. Therefore, our study corroborates previous analyses based on molecular and morphological evidences that suggested that A. micropholis and A. khamirensis were valid species.
Ecological species concept, fringed-toed lizard, Iranian Plateau, precipitation, temperature
Species delimitation is a great challenge in biology (
Lacertid lizards of the genus Acanthodactylus have a wide distribution range from North Africa through the Middle East and Iranian Plateau (
In this study, the ecological niche differentiation between two species (Acanthodactylus micropholis Blanford, 1874 and A. khamirensis Heidari, Rastegar-Pouyani, Rastegar-Pouyani & Rajabizadeh, 2013) was examined. Also, modeling was used to predict the potential distribution of both species in south of Iran and the degree of niche space overlap between them. Finally, we discuss important abiotic factors (temperature and precipitation) affecting geographic isolation and niche differentiation based upon ecological niche modeling.
All occurrence records of both species were obtained from the literature (
To assess the niche differentiation of two species, niche overlap and niche identity tests were examined based on the habitat suitability scores from SDM (
Based on the occurrence records, the distribution range of two species overlapped. Predicted models confirmed the species distribution in southern Iran (Figs
Habitat suitability for A. micropholis was distinctly focused on southeastern Iran, reflecting the current distribution pattern of the species (
Niche overlap between A. khamirensis and A. micropholis indicated that their niche similarity was lower than 0.5 (Hellinger’s-based I = 0.713 and Schoener’s D = 0.426) supporting the recognition of both taxa at the specific level. The identity test indicated that the null hypothesis regarding niche overlap can be rejected and the two species are distinctly differentiated in their ecological niches. The result of the niche identity test (Fig.
Relative importance and percentage of contribution of variables used in MaxEnt model for A. khamirensis and A. micropholis. The most contributed variables for each species are in bold.
Description of variables | Percentage of contribution (%) | |
A. khamirensis | A. micropholis | |
Isothermality | 0.3 | – |
Minimum temperature of coldest month | – | 61.7 |
Mean temperature of driest quarter | 2 | 1 |
Annual precipitation | – | 24.2 |
Precipitation seasonality | 85.1 | – |
Precipitation of driest quarter | 12.6 | 13.1 |
The notion of evolutionary lineages diverging by occupying different niches is the basis of one of the oldest species concepts (Ecological Species Concept – ESC,
Recently, the genus Acanthodactylus was revised and a new species from the A. micropholis complex was described (
The habitat suitability prediction for Acanthodactylus micropholis in southeastern Iran showed that its distribution pattern completely covered the predicted area (Fig.
The present study indicates ecological niche divergences between the two spiny-toed lacertids of the genus Acanthodactylus and these results corroborate previous molecular and morphological conclusions (
I am pleased to thank from Ann Paterson, who edited the first draft of the manuscript. The manuscript did not undergo grammar revision and any improprieties of English proficiency are the authors’ entire responsibility.
Records used to predict the habitat suitability of Acanthodactylus khamirensis and A. micropholis.
Taxon name | Latitude, Longitude |
---|---|
Acanthodactylus micropholis | 27.017, 55.717 |
27.200, 60.450 | |
27.179, 60.382 | |
27.817, 60.200 | |
26.283, 59.517 | |
27.350, 62.350 | |
29.500, 60.867 | |
29.967, 60.850 | |
27.483, 62.783 | |
28.233, 61.233 | |
27.117, 61.667 | |
29.817, 60.400 | |
27.967, 60.800 | |
25.367, 61.250 | |
28.667, 60.400 | |
28.617, 58.967 | |
27.133, 59.100 | |
25.917, 61.600 | |
Acanthodactylus micropholis (continued) | 28.150, 60.300 |
26.533, 62.317 | |
26.833, 55.750 | |
26.945, 56.241 | |
26.836, 57.425 | |
26.632, 55.016 | |
28.182, 55.822 | |
27.634, 56.217 | |
29.672, 60.834 | |
29.650, 59.767 | |
28.490, 51.473 | |
27.715, 56.166 | |
27.717, 56.165 | |
27.730, 56.149 | |
25.469, 60.494 | |
25.365, 60.630 | |
29.796, 59.853 | |
Acanthodactylus khamirensis | 26.987, 55.645 |
26.978, 55.506 | |
26.934, 55.502 | |
26.928, 55.354 | |
26.825, 55.414 | |
26.911, 55.339 | |
26.990, 55.596 | |
26.998, 55.700 | |
27.010, 55.588 |