Research Article |
Corresponding author: Luciane Marinoni ( luciane.marinoni@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Alessandra Rung
© 2019 Lisiane Dilli Wendt, Luciane Marinoni.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Dilli Wendt L, Marinoni L (2019) Taxonomic revision of Megalothoraca (Diptera: Richardiidae) with description of a new species, synonyms and new combination. Zoologia 36: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.36.e31456
|
A taxonomic revision of Megalothoracha Hendel, 1911 is provided, including a description of Megalothoraca rosalyae Wendt, sp. nov. from Colombia. The genus encompasses large species from Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia (new record), and each species was described based either on males or females. These species can be diagnosed by long and slender mid and hind legs and wing longer than body, vein R2+3 with two strong curves on apical third, and short spurious vein medially. And males have costal vein conspicuously bowed anteriorly and thickened on medial portion. The following nomenclatural changes are made: Megalothoraca hendeli Enderlein, 1912, syn. nov. is a junior synonym of M. pterodontida Hendel, 1911; Batrachophthalmum teleopsis (Hennig, 1938) comb. nov. is transferred from Megalothoraca, and Batrachophthalmum quimbaya Carvalho, Wolff & Wendt, 2011, syn. nov. is a junior synonym of B. teleopsis. A key to species and illustrations of the female and male terminalia are provided.
Identification key, Neotropical, new record, Richardiinae, taxonomy, Tephritoidea
With about 210 valid species (
Megalothoraca Hendel, 1911 includes six large species (8.0–12.4 mm) with long and slender mid and hind legs. The genus has been recorded from Peru, Ecuador (
Herein, we provide a new diagnosis and redescription of Megalothoracha and each of the six previously included species, based on the revision of all types. Additionally, one species from Colombia is described, a new combination and synonymies are proposed, and an identification key and illustrations of the male and female terminalia are provided.
The external morphological terminology follows
Label data of types are given exactly as written and presented as follow: individual lines are separated with a backslash (\); individual labels are separated with quotes (“”), square brackets ([]) indicate information not present on the specimen labels.
All type material of Megalotharaca was studied during visits to the following collections (abbreviation and curators are between parenthesis): Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary (HNHM, Z. Soltész), Polish Academy of Science, Museum of the Institute of Zoology, Warsaw, Poland (MZPW, T. Huflejt), Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Müncheberg, Germany (SDEI, Frank Menzel), and Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany (ZMHB, J. Ziegler).
Figures
The holotype of the new species described here, and one non-type specimen of M. pterodontida Hendel were borrowed from Colección Entomológica, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (CEUA, Marta Wolff) and from ZMHB, respectively. This material was studied with a stereoscopic microscope Nikon SMZ800 with camera lucida attached (for confection of drawings). Images of the relevant external structures (Figs
Megalothoraca
Hendel, 1911a: 395 (type species: Megalothoraca pterodontida Hendel, 1911, by monotypy);
Phlebacrocyma
Enderlein, 1912: 105 (type species: Phlebacrocyma undulosum Enderlein, 1912, original designation);
Megalothoraca species are large (8.0–12.4 mm), with thorax well developed and wing generally longer than body, mid and hind legs long and slender, fore leg generally conspicuously more robust than the others (at least in males), and abdomen oval. Males and females of the included species are unique in lacking spine-like seta on the posteroventral surface of the mid and hind femora; mid femur with only one anteroventral spine-like seta and hind femur with one or two such setae (e.g. Fig.
The following features of Megalothoraca are shared with Euolena egregia (Gerstaecker, 1860) and species of Bathachophtalmum Hendel, 1911: antero- and posteroventral spine-like setae on fore femur distinctly more numerous and robust than on mid and hind femora; palpus straight. Moreover, species of Megalothoraca are similar to species of Batrachophthalmum, Euolena Loew, 1873 (in part) and Hemixantha Loew, 1873 (in part) in the male terminalia with medial surstylus bilobed at apex, and prensiseta long and inserted preapically on inner margin. Species of Megalothoraca can be easily differentiated by the venation of their wing, thorax well developed, number and thickness of the spine-like setae on mid and hind femora and the presence of setulae on hind coxa, as described above.
The general morphology of Megalothoraca species is quite regular, and the chaetotaxy of the head and especially the thorax is very similar among species. The main characteristics used to distinguish them are the coloration of the body and the wing spots. Since all species were described based on either male or female specimens and no species is known from both sexes, it is not possible to ascertain whether there is sexual dimorphism. Megalothoraca undulosa (Enderlein, 1912), M. ferruginea (Enderlein, 1912), and M. rosalyae sp. nov., (known only from females) lack a lobe on the costal vein; have narrower medial band on the wing, lack anterior spine-like setae on the fore and mid coxae, and their thorax is not as well developed as the thorax of males (M. pterodontida Hendel, 1911 and M. flava).
Megalothoraca ferruginea, M. flava, M. pterodontida, M. rosalyae sp. nov., M. undulosa.
Large species, length 8.2–12.4 mm, commonly with wing longer than body (except in M. ferruginea). Robust body, with general colour yellow (Fig.
Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia (new record).
1 | Thorax and legs entirely yellow (Figs |
M. flava Enderlein, 1912 [♂] |
1’ | Thorax and at least some parts of legs reddish brown, or pale brown to dark brown (Figs |
2 |
2 | Head and thorax entirely reddish brown (Figs |
M. ferruginea (Enderlein, 1912) [♀] |
2’ | Head and thorax entirely dark brown (Figs |
3 |
3 | Tarsi yellowish white, contrasting with dark brown leg (Figs |
M. undulosa (Enderlein, 1912) [♀] |
3’ | Tarsi not contrasting with remaining other portions of leg, brownish (Fig. |
4 |
4 | Ocellar seta absent (Fig. |
M. rosalyae Wendt, sp. nov. |
4’ | Ocellar seta present and postpronotal seta absent. Postpronotal lobe concolorous with scutum (Fig. |
M. pterodontida Hendel, 1911 [♂] |
Phlebacrocyma ferruginea
Enderlein, 1912: 106. Type locality: Santa Inez, Ecuador.
Megalothoraca ferruginea Steyskal, 1968: 5 (catalogue).
Megalothoraca ferruginea, known from a female specimen, is the only species within genus with head and thorax entirely reddish brown, fore and mid coxae, fore and mid femora pale brown (Figs
Holotype female, MZPW: Measurements (in mm): body length 8.20 (8.50 according to
Male. Unknown.
Holotype female, MZPW: “Santa Inéz\(Ecuad. [Ecuador])\R.Haensch S.”; “Type” [red label]; “Phlebacrocyma\ferrugineum\Type Enderl. ♀ [handwritten]\Dr. Enderlein det. 1912” (Fig.
Ecuador.
Megalothoraca flava
Enderlein, 1912: 104. Holotype male (MZPW). Type locality: Santa Inez, Ecuador.
Megalothoraca flava, known only from a male, is distinct by having thorax and legs entirely yellow (Fig.
Holotype male, MZPW: Measurements (in mm): body length 12.4 (11.75 according to
Female. Unknown.
T
Holotype male, MZPW: “Santa Inéz\(Ecuad. [Ecuador])\R.Haensch S.”; “Type” [red label]; “Megalothoraca\flava\Type Enderl. ♂ [handwritten]\Dr. Enderlein det. 1912” (Fig.
Megalothoraca pterodontida
Hendel, 1911a: 395. Type locality: Peru, Cagon (1000m).
Megalothoraca hendeli
Enderlein, 1912: 104. Type locality: Ecuador, Santa Jnéz.
Megalothoraca pterodontida, known from male specimens, is recognized by body mostly dark brown (Figs
Holotype male (Figs
Female. Unknown.
Megalothoraca pterodontida Hendel, holotype male, HNHM: “Cagon\Peru (1000 m.)”; “Megalothoraca\pterodontida\typus” [handwritten]; “TYPUS” [red label] (Fig.
Peru. Cagón, 1000 m [without date and collector], det. Kertész (1 male, HNHM); Department Cuzco, Callanga river, i. Thale des Piñipini [valley], 1900, 1500m, Garlepp col., det. Enderlein (2 males, ZMHB); Bolivia. [La Paz] Mapiri [without date and collector], det. Enderlein, 1919[?] (1 male, ZMHB).
Legs. The specimen from Bolivia has the fore coxa with anterior seta stout, but not as spine-like seta. The number of antero- and posteroventral spine-like on fore femur can moderately vary in greater or lesser number than on the holotype. Wing. Non-type material from Bolivia (Fig.
Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia (new record).
Megalothoraca pterodontida: (12, 14, 16–18) Holotype male, HNHM; (13, 15, 19) Non-type male, ZMHB. (12) Photo of box with holotype (left) and non-type material (right) male from HNHM; (13) habitus dorsal; (14, 15) habitus lateral; (16) wing; (17) labels; (18) wing, costal vein in detail; (19) head, lateral. Scale bars: 14–17 = 2.0 mm, 19 = 1.0 mm.
Megalothoraca pterodontida, non type male, ZMHB, drawing lines: (23–27) sternites, ventral: (23) sternite 1; (24) sternite 2; (25) sternite 3; (26) sternite 4; (27) sternite 5; (28, 29) epandrium, medial and lateral surstyli, and cerci; (28) posterior view; (29) lateral view. Scale bars = 0.2 mm.
Megalothoraca rosalyae sp. nov., known from a female specimen, can be recognized by general dark brown (almost black) color of the thorax (Figs
Holotype female, CEUA: Measurements (in mm): body length 8.57; wing length 8.80; abdomen length 3.47. Head (Figs
Male. Unknown.
Holotype female, CEUA: “Colombia, Antioquia, Bolivar\Vereda la Mina, Bosques\cercanos a la mina, 1900m.\5.80358ºN 76.0691ºW, Manual\24.iv.2011. E. Garcias col. CEUA”; “Holotype (♀) CEUA\Megalothoraca rosalyae\Wendt & Marinoni, 201_” [red label] (CEUA). Specimen pinned, in excellent condition, with no damage (Figs
Colombia.
The epithet honors the Brazilian dipterist Rosaly Ale-Rocha, in recognition of her extensive contributions to the taxonomy of Diptera.
Megalothoraca rosalyae sp. nov., holotype female, CEUA: (30) habitus dorsal; (31) habitus lateral; (32–36) head: (32) frontal; (33) laterofrontal, dorsal region, in detail; (34) lateral; (35) dorsal, ocellar triangle, in detail; (36) dorsal, general view; (37) thorax, dorsal; (38) thorax, lateral; (39) fore femur, posterior view; (40) mid and hind femur, anterior view. Scale bars: 30, 31 = 2.0 mm, 32, 34, 36–40 = 1.0 mm.
Megalothoraca rosalyae sp. nov., holotype female, CEUA: (41) Line drawing of abdomen, dorsal; (42–47) sternites, ventral: (42) sternite 1; (43) sternite 2; (44) sternite 3; (45) sternite 4; (46) sternite 5; (47) sternite 6; (48) wing (spurious vein in detail, left side); (49–51) cerci and segment 8: (49) general view, ventral; (50) in detail, ventral; (51) general view, lateral; (52) spermatechae; (53) oviscape, taenia, eversible membrane, segment 8, and cerci. Scale bars: 41, 48, 53 = 1.0 mm, 42–47, 49, 51, 52 = 0.2 mm.
Phlebacrocyma undulosa
Enderlein, 1912: 105 (fig. 6: wing). Type locality: Ecuador, Santa Inéz.
Megalothoraca undulosa Steyskal, 1968: 5 (catalogue, new combination).
Megalothoraca undulosa, known from a female specimen, can be distinguished from all other species within the genus by having all tarsi yellowish white, sharply contrasted with the rest of leg, dark brown (Figs
Holotype female, MZPW: Measurements (in mm). Body length 10.0; abdomen length 4.6; wing length 9.5 (9.0 according to
Male. Unknown.
Holotype female, MZPW: “Santa Inéz\(Ecuad. [Ecuador])\R. Haensch S.”; “Type” [red label]; “Megalothoraca\undulosum\Type Enderl. ♀ [handwritten]\Dr. Enderlein det. 1912” (Fig.
Megalothoraca teleopsis
Hennig, 1938b: 9 (fig. 3: head). Type locality: Colombia, San Antonio.
Batrachophthamum quimbaya
Carvalho, Wolff & Wendt, 2011: 44 (figs 6–10: male head, habitus, wing, and thorax). Type locality: Colombia, Pereira. Distribution: Colombia. References:
Megalothoraca teleopsis Hennig, holotype male, SDEI: “S. Antonio\Columbia”; “coll. [collector] Fassl” [handwritten]; “Holotypus” [red label]; “HOLOTYPUS” [red label] (Fig.
Colombia.
Megalothoraca teleopsis was described by
Megalothoraca teleopsis and Batrachophthalmum rufiventre Hendel, 1911 type species of the genus, share several characteristics, then here we transfer M. teleopsis to Batrachophthalmum, based on: as well B. rufiventre, M. teleopsis has the mid and hind femora with rows of weak spine-like setae on antero- and posterodorsal surfaces, and contrasting with the mid and hind femora of the other species of Megalothoraca, which have one (sometimes two) stout spines only on anteroventral surface. Also, M. teleopsis has vein R2+3 without spurious vein and sinuous just before margin (Fig.
Batrachophthalmum species are recognized by the following combination of characteristics: head wider than high, especially in males; arista densely pubescent; all femora with spine-like setae on antero- and posteroventral; setae on fore femur distinctly more robust than those on mid and hind femora; hind coxa bare on posterior surface; costal vein of male with no modification, R2+3 without spurious vein, with only one tender sinuosity on apical third sinuous just before margin; r-m at distal three-fourths of cell dm.
We are very grateful to the following curators for the loan of material and/or for access to the collections: M Wolff (CEUA), Z. Soltész (HNHM), T. Huflejt (MZPW), F. Menzel (SDEI) and J. Ziegler (ZMHB). We thank Dominika Mierzwa from MZPW for kindly taking the photos of some types from the collection. This research, as well as the travels to visit the collection were funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) through the support of the project “Ampliação do conhecimento em taxonomia, sistemática e aspectos biológicos de Tephritoidea (Diptera) na Região Neotropical, em especial das famílias Tephritidae e Richardiidae” (process 400829/2014-2). L. Wendt and L. Marinoni also thank CNPq for the fellowships provided (process 152777/2016-4 and PQ307732/2015-0, respectively). Part of the photos were taken with Automontage equipment available to us through the project “Taxonline: Rede Paranaense de Coleções Biológicas” headed by L. Marinoni. Also, our thanks to Wayne Mathis from Smithsonian Institution, USA, for proofreading the manuscript.