Research Article |
Corresponding author: Camila F. Castro ( camifc@yahoo.com ) Academic editor: Ângelo Pinto
© 2021 Nathália Del G. da R. Celli, Lúcia M. Almeida, Daniel S. Basílio, Camila F. Castro.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Celli NGR, Almeida LM, Basílio DS, Castro CF (2021) The way to maturity: taxonomic study on immatures of Southern Brazilian Coccinellini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) species important in biological control. Zoologia 38: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.38.e64154
|
Among the predatory ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera), members of the Coccinellini, predators of aphids and psyllids, stand out. Although the beneficial status of these beetles has been acknowledged by biological control researchers, there are no keys or detailed studies on the immature stages of South American Coccinellidae, especially Coccinellini. We provide descriptions and illustrations of the immatures and adults of major predatory Coccinellini species in southern Brazil along with an identification key for fourth instar larvae and pupae. The following species are included: Cycloneda sanguinea (Linnaeus, 1763), Eriopis connexa (Germar, 1824), Harmonia axyridis (Pallas, 1773), Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, 1842 and Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant, 1866). The morphological study, which included the use of scanning electron microscopy, revealed new characters such as the type of tarsal claws, spiracles, chalazae, parascoli and strumae. The identification key provided here may be useful in biological control programs.
Adults, Coccinellinae, larvae, morphology, predators, pupae
The ladybird beetles of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) are known as the most efficient predators, mainly of aphids and of the first larval instars of Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera, small Diptera and Thysanoptera (
Among the predatory species of Coccinellidae, Coccinellini stand out, feeding mainly on aphids and psyllids, considered harmful insects, because they suck the sap of numerous cultivated plants (
The Coccinellini species Cycloneda sanguinea (Linnaeus, 1763), Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant, 1866), Eriopis connexa (Germar, 1824), Harmonia axyridis (Pallas, 1773) and Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, 1842 are particularly important in southern Brazil, because they have potential for use in biological control programs (
In general, the larvae of Coccinellidae have the shape of the body variable from oval to elongated; integument usually pigmented and with tubercles, covered with processes or branched spines, sometimes coated with waxy secretion; head usually pigmented; epicranial suture with V-shaped frontal arms; coronal suture long, absent in most genera; frons with setae; antennae short and robust, usually tri-articulated, mandible almost always uni- or bidentate, reduced mola; labium with 2 or rarely 1-segmented palps; legs generally long and well separated from each other; abdomen with nine tergites, ventral or posterolateral abdominal segment 10, sometimes terminal and rounded with annular spiracles (
The pupae are oval to elongated, integument usually pigmented with bristles, wings are usually lightly sclerotized with intersegmental membranes exposed, membranous and tapered apically; in Coccinellini the 4 to 7 abdominal terga are sclerotized; terga 1 to 8 with abdominal spiracles; tergum 9 modified into a pair of urogomphi that anchor the pupa to the substrate (
There are few studies presenting data on the immature forms of Coccinellidae.
There are no keys or detailed studies on the immature stages of South American Coccinellidae, especially of Coccinellini. Therefore, the aim of this study is to provide, for the first time, descriptions, and keys for fourth instar larvae and pupae of the main predators known from southern Brazil.
Adults of Cycloneda sanguinea, Eriopis connexa, Harmonia axyridis, Hippodamia convergens and Olla v-nigrum were manually collected in Curitiba and Palotina, state of Paraná, and Recife, state of Pernambuco, Brazil and reared in 500 mL plastic dishes in rearing chambers (BOD) at 25 ± 1 °C, 70% ± 10% R.H. and 12:12 h L:D. The food, Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller, 1879), was supplied daily to maintain the population stock.
After eclosion, the larvae were placed individually in Petri dishes lined with filter paper and a cotton swab moistened with a drop of honey and reared in the same conditions. The larvae and pupae were fixed in Kahle-Dietrich. For morphological studies, the specimens were boiled in 10% KOH for a few seconds, washed in distilled water and then dissected.
The morphological studies were performed using stereomicroscopes ZEISS Stemi SV6 and Stereo Discovery V20. The larvae were photographed using a Sony Cyber-Shot (DSC-W300) digital camera coupled in microscope Standard M 20, stereomicroscopes ahead mentioned. The larvae and pupae measurements were made in stereoscopic microscope Wild 15. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were produced with a JEOL JSM-6360LV scanning electron microscope in the Electronic Microscopy Center, Universidade Federal do Paraná.
Short descriptions and illustrations of adults were included to associate immatures and adults of each species. The terminology used in the descriptions follows
The color and structures of the immature stages such as parascoli, strumae, chalazae (Figs
1. | Body with parascoli (Figs |
2 |
1’. | Body without parascoli (Figs |
3 |
2. | Parascoli long and robust (Figs |
Harmonia axyridis (Pallas, 1773) |
2’. | Parascoli short and slender (Figs |
Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, 1842 |
3. | Pronotum without spots, with yellowish central longitudinal band and lateral margins (Fig. |
Cycloneda sanguinea (Linnaeus, 1763) |
3’. | Pronotum with spots, without central longitudinal band (Figs |
4 |
4. | Abdominal tergites 2 to 8 with the same spotted pattern (Fig. |
Eriopis connexa (Germar, 1824) |
4’. | Abdominal tergite 4 with different spots pattern, with yellow banded spots (Fig. |
Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant, 1866) |
1. | First abdominal tergite with defined dark spots; second and third abdominal tergites with central and lateral spots merged (Figs |
Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, 1842 |
1’. | First abdominal tergite lacking dark spots; second and third abdominal tergites with only one spot or more than one spot distinctly separated (Figs |
2 |
2. | Second and third abdominal tergites with only one spot on each side (Figs |
3 |
2’. | Second and third abdominal tergites with more than one spot on each side (Figs |
4 |
3. | Abdomen with oval spots, separated each other and not extending to central area (Figs |
Harmonia axyridis (Pallas, 1773) |
3’. | Abdomen with subtriangular spots, connected on the central area (Figs |
Eriopis connexa (Germar, 1824) |
4. | Fourth and fifth abdominal tergites with no more than one spot on each side (Figs |
Cycloneda sanguinea (Linnaeus, 1763) |
4’. | Fourth and fifth abdominal tergites with more than one spot on each side (Figs |
Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant, 1866) |
(1–6) Schematic drawing of Coccinellidae larvae and its body structures: (1) larva, dorsal view; (2) seta; (3) chalaza; (4) scolus; (5) parascolus; (6) struma (Modified from
(Figs
(Figs
Length 1.98–2.20 mm; width 0.56–0.71 mm. Body elongate, cylindrical and tapered, with whitish integument, and brown head and thoracic plates. Head similar to fourth instar larva. Parascoli short and thick. Abdominal parascoli similar in size and color to these on the meso and metanotum.
Length 3.30–3.94 mm; width 1.08–1.17 mm. Parascoli darker than those on the first instar. Head structures similar to the first instar larva; thoracic and abdominal parascoli proportionally larger.
Length 5.42–6.83 mm; width 1.67–1.75 mm. Larva similar to the fourth instar. Abdomen with segments 1 to 4 yellow in the dorsolateral regions; parascoli of the same color as the integument.
(Figs
Harmonia axyridis , fourth larval instar: (18) head, dorsal view; (19) mandible; (20) antenna; (21) stemmata; (22) maxillary palpus; (23) labial palpus; (24) tarsal claw; (25) mesothoracic spiracle; (26) abdominal spiracle. Scale bars: 18 = 200 µm; 19, 21, 24 = 100 µm; 20, 23, 25, 26 = 20 µm; 22 = 50 µm.
(Fig.
(Figs
Length 1.80–2.00 mm; width 0.60–0.72 mm. Body elongated, cylindrical and tapering, with whitish integument with the head and light brown thoracic plates. Head similar to the fourth instar larva. Prothoracic and abdominal strumae with long chalazae, with color similar to the other instars.
Length 3.33–3.92 mm; width 0.08–1.17 mm. Chalazae smaller than those of the first instar. Head structures similar to those of the first instar larva.
Length 4.75–5.83 mm; width 1.50–1.67 mm. Strongly similar to fourth instar.
(Figs
Hippodamia convergens , fourth larval instar: (31) head, dorsal view; (32) mandible; (33) antenna; (34) stemmata; (35) maxillary palpus; (36) labial palpus; (37) tarsal claw; (38) mesothoracic spiracle; (39) abdominal spiracle. Scale bars: 31 = 200 µm; 32, 34, 37 = 100 µm; 33, 36, 38, 39 = 20 µm; 35 = 50 µm.
(Fig.
(Figs
Length 1.52–2.60 mm; width 0.52–0.72 mm. Elongated, cylindrical, and tapering body, with whitish integument; head and thoracic plates light brown. Head like the fourth instar larva. Prothoracic and abdominal strumae with long chalazae, with color similar to the other instars.
Length 2.50–3.50 mm; width 0.67–1.08 mm. Chalazae smaller than those of the first instar. The head structures similar to those of the first instar larva.
Length 3.58–4.92 mm; width 1.17–1.42 mm. Chalazae with size similar to those of the second instar and color similar to that of the fourth instar.
(Figs
Cycloneda sanguinea , fourth larval instar: (44) head, dorsal view; (45) mandible; (46) antenna; (47) stemmata; (48) maxillary palpus; (49) labial palpus; (50) tarsal claw; (51) mesothoracic spiracle; (52) abdominal spiracle. Scale bars: 44 = 200 µm; 45 = 100 µm; 46, 49, 51, 52 = 20 µm; 47, 48, 50 = 50 µm.
(Fig.
(Figs
Length 1.44–2.32 mm; width 0.44–0.56 mm. Elongated, cylindrical, and tapering body, with whitish yellow integument, with brown head and thoracic plates brown. Head, stemmata, antennae, and mouthparts similar to fourth instar larva. Pro-thoracic strumae longer than those of the fourth instar. Abdominal strumae similar in size and color to those of the meso and metanotum.
Length 4.00–4.50 mm; width 0.08–1.00 mm. Thoracic and abdominal strumae shorter than those of the first instar; head structures similar to those of the first instar.
Length 4.17–5.25 mm; width 0.92–1.25 mm. Larvae with color similar to the fourth instar.
(Figs
Eriopis connexa , fourth larval instar: (57) head, dorsal view; (58) mandible; (59) antenna; (60) stemmata; (61) maxillary palpus; (62) labial palpus; (63) tarsal claw; (64) mesothoracic spiracle; (65) abdominal spiracle. Scale bars: 57, 60 = 200 µm; 58 = 100 µm; 59, 62, 64, 65 = 20 µm; 61, 63 = 50 µm.
(Figs
(Figs
Length 1.20–2.00 mm; width 0.48–0.64 mm. Body elongated, cylindrical and tapered, with whitish yellow integument. Head, thoracic plates and legs brown. Head similar to fourth instar larva, with epicranial suture, stemmata, antennae and mouthparts similar to the fourth instar. Prothoracic and abdominal strumae with short-bristled chalazae.
Length 3.33–4.58 mm; width 0.83–1.17 mm. Head and strumae similar to the first instar.
Length 4.00–5.42 mm; width 1.00–1.42 mm. Larva similar to the fourth instar in structure and color; pronotum with small-defined spots.
(Figs
Olla v-nigrum , fourth larval instar: (71) head, dorsal view; (72) mandible; (73) antenna; (74) stemmata; (75) maxillary palpus; (76) labial palpus; (77) tarsal claw; (78) mesothoracic spiracle; (79) abdominal spiracle. Scale bars: 71 = 200 µm; 72, 77 = 100 µm; 73, 76, 78, 79 = 20 µm; 74, 75 = 50µm.
Despite the acknowledged importance of Coccinellidae larvae and adults in biological control programs, the focus of the main studies still is on the adults, which creates a gap in the knowledge about immature stages of the ladybird beetles.
According to
The morphological characteristics of immatures differ according to their performance as a predator. The presence of parascoli is one of the main differences observed in the studied species. Harmonia axyridis is the only species that has more sclerotized, long, and robust parascoli, in addition to the larger body size, which may indicate greater aggressiveness comparing to native species (
Hippodamia convergens
also has parascoli, however smaller and slender. Such structures act in defense and therefore are considered important in species more efficient as agents in biological control. It is the case of these two species, Hippodamia convergens and Harmonia axyridis, which were introduced to control aphids in different regions of the world (
Based on the mouthparts’ morphology of the species, it is possible to evidence the type of preferred food, both for larvae and adults, as their mandibles are generally morphologically similar, robust, with acute apical teeth and with developed mola (
The Coccinellini species present characters comparable to Eupalea reinhardti Crotch, 1874 (Coccidulini) by the type of parascoli on the abdomen and the distribution of the tergal plates. The spiracles of the studied larvae are annular like in all Coccinellidae however they differ from those of Eupalea reinhardti by having chalazae (
Eriopis connexa and Hippodamia convergens do not have a basal tooth in the tarsal claw, which differentiates these species from the others, which have a tarsal claw with a subquadrate basal tooth.
Some larval characters like the type of tarsal claws, spiracles, chalazae, parascoli and strumae were studied for the first time thanks to the use of the electron microscope. This enriches our knowledge about morphology of Coccinellini immature stages.
The identification key provided here, being an addition to the existing biology articles, may help in future biological control programs, as complementing the knowledge of species of common predators in the southern region of Brazil.
We thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (NDGRC 134152/2015-8, LMA 308992/2017-2; DSB 140255/2015-0, CFC 401366/2014-6), and to the Electronic Microscopy Center from Universidade Federal do Paraná. We also thank Lino Bittencourt Monteiro (Laboratório de Manejo Integrado de Pragas, UFPR), Instituto Paranaense de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural (EMATER), Paschoal C. Grossi and Fernando W.T. Leivas for providing live insects for rearing. Thank the reviewers for critically reviewing and improving the manuscript; we are also indebted to John Fiorese, for revision of English.