
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from Zoologia</title>
        <description>Latest 2 Articles from Zoologia</description>
        <link>https://zoologia.pensoft.net/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2026 05:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Metrics derived from fish assemblages as indicators of environmental degradation in Cerrado streams</title>
		    <link>https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/12895/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Zoologia 35: 1-8</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.35.e12895</p>
					<p>Authors: Milton P. Ávila, Rafaela Neves Carvalho, Lilian Casatti, Juliana Simião-Ferreira, Lorrane Faria de Morais, Fabrício B. Teresa</p>
					<p>Abstract: The development of effective monitoring tools depends on finding sensitive metrics that are capable of detecting the most important environmental impacts at a given region. We assessed if metrics derived from stream fish assemblages reflect physical habitat degradation and changes in land cover. We sampled the ichthyofauna and environmental characteristics of 16 stream sites of first and second order in the Upper Tocantins River basin. The streams were classified according to their environmental characteristics into reference (n = 5), intermediate (n = 4), and impacted (n = 7). A total of 4,079 individuals in five orders, 12 families, and 30 species were collected. Of the 20 metrics tested, eight were non-collinear and were tested for their performance in discriminating among groups of streams. Three metrics were sensitive to the gradient of degradation: Berger-Parker dominance index, percentage of characiform fish, and percentage of rheophilic individuals. Some commonly used metrics did not reflect the disturbances and many others were redundant with those that did. These results indicate that the metrics derived from fish assemblages may be informative for identifying the conservation status of streams, with the potential to be used in biomonitoring.</p>
					<p><a href="https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/12895/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/12895/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/12895/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Relationship between bird-of-prey decals and bird-window collisions on a Brazilian university campus</title>
		    <link>https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/13729/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Zoologia 34: 1-8</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/zoologia.34.e13729</p>
					<p>Authors: Thaís Brisque, Lucas Andrei Campos-Silva, Augusto João Piratelli</p>
					<p>Abstract: Bird-window collisions are a dramatic cause of bird mortality globally. In Latin America, statistics are generally very scarce and/or inaccessible so the frequency of such incidents is still poorly understood. Nevertheless, civilians have applied preventive methods (e.g. adhesive bird-of-prey decals) sparsely but, to our knowledge, no study has evaluated their effectiveness in Brazil. Here, we estimated the mortality rate of bird-window collisions and tested the effectiveness of bird-of-prey decals at preventing such accidents. We undertook daily searches for bird carcasses, presumably resulting from window collisions, near all buildings on a university campus over seven months. Adhesive bird-of-prey decals were then applied to the two buildings with the highest mortality rates and surveys continued for over 12 more months. The mortality rates before and after the application of decals and between seasons were then compared using Friedman test. We recorded 36 collisions, 29 around the two buildings with the highest collision rates 19 prior and 10 after our intervention with associated collision rates of 0.08 and 0.04 collisions/day. Although mortality was reduced by almost half, this difference was not statistically significant. The Blue-black grassquit, Volatinia jacarina (Linnaeus, 1766), and Ruddy ground dove, Columbina talpacoti (Temminck, 1810) suffered the highest number of collisions, followed by the Rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis (P. L. Statius Müller, 1776). Our bird-of-prey decals and efforts were insufficient to prevent or dramatically reduce the number of bird-window collisions. Therefore, we recommend that different interventions be used and additional long-term studies undertaken on their efficacy.</p>
					<p><a href="https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/13729/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/13729/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/13729/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	